Skip to main content

Types of people

 I am writing regularly about the office politics, but one thing I haven’t write so much is about the people who work in the office and the danger to work for specific types of people.

At first, I was totally against this classification. I believe all people are capable of great work and professionalism. But now I know better. There are people who will slack or will never commit to expand their skills and knowledge.

They will just live their life with no need to improve themselves. This is bad news for the people who want to do, be , achieve more.

So I ended up adopting the classification for the people.

There are three types of people A, B, C.

A type are people who constantly developing themselves, are curious about others and the world and are proactive in what they do. Those are people who others want to work with. Usually, manager of type A wants to work with type A people, unless they are insecure. If the latter is true, they will hire B and C people to ensure that none of them will replace the manager.

B people are less proactive than A, but they still have some sort of professionalism. They might read and learn less and they might feel threatened by other A players on the team. They will try to push their opinion and listen less to other people. B manager will rarely hire A player, they will look for someone compliant and will hire either B or C employees.

C people are those who slack. They might be all talk and no action. They are the one who might have the biggest chances to be promoted to higher roles, because they don’t have their own opinion. The company's opinion is their own. They are amazing when the company is doing well and there is no need for innovative ideas, but once the winds turn, you don’t want to have C managers. They're not very creative or proactive and will do whatever it takes to hold on to their power.  Of course, C managers will most likely hire C or B people for their team.

By adopting such categorization, it is easy to see why big corporations lack creativity and innovation and why it is so hard to shift the perspective and save the company once things go bad. So, how do the big corporations handle it? They purchase other companies instead of introducing new products.


Popular posts from this blog

The messy meeting

When you know there will be a messy meeting and there is nothing you can do about it, the best thing to do is to avoid it. Messy people produce messy meetings, and they take the time and the energy of everyone who is part of it. That is why instead of being part of this drama, find a better team and better meetings to invest your precious energy.

When you forget

When you forget to show up on time, you lose your credibility. When you forget to save your work, you lose momentum. When you forget to go to a business meeting, you lose the additional revenue. To forget is the ultimate sign of lack of focus. You need to focus on what you do to be able to achieve the next level.

Twitter is a dead long live twitter

 Corporate rebranding takes time. It is carefully calibrated and represents the new directions of the company. Unless it is Twitter. Then the change can happen in a matter of a week. The domain pointed yesterday to a page with one character “X”. Today it redirects to the twitter domain and soon we might see the dead of the bird and the birth of the symbol “X”. This change will be followed carefully and we can all learn from the mistakes Elon Musk will do during this transition. He already is very famous with the mistakes he did during his first weeks in the company. Can the company survive such a transformation is another open question? There are already some competitors like Mastodon and Instagram very own Threads. But the vision of Elon Musk is to turn this app more like WeChat, the Chinese mega app that combines many features. The issue with such a combination of too many businesses and too many regulations might play a crucial role in the downfall of the company. Many times s